Vol. I · Est. 2025 · Houston, TX
Peptide Atlas
The Complete Map of Peptide Research
PCAC Result
BPC-157Rec. 503A
TB-500Rec. 503A
KPVRec. 503A
MOTS-cRec. 503A
SemaxRec. 503A
EpitalonRec. 503A
DSIPDeclined
Compound Comparison — GH Secretagogues
Compound A
CJC-1295
Modified GRF 1–29 · GHRH analog, no DAC
A synthetic analog of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH), modified at four positions to increase plasma stability. Stimulates GH release from the pituitary by binding GHRH receptors. Often referred to as "Mod GRF" in community discussions to distinguish it from the DAC form.
Preclinical / Early HumanNot reviewedHigh Divergence
Compound B
Ipamorelin
Ipamorelin · GHRP · Selective GH secretagogue
A pentapeptide GH secretagogue that acts on the ghrelin receptor (GHSR-1a) to stimulate GH release. Distinguished by its selectivity: it stimulates GH with minimal effect on cortisol and prolactin, unlike earlier GHRP compounds. Reached Phase 2 human trials, giving it a modest human evidence base.
Phase 2 Human DataNot reviewedModerate Divergence
All comparisons are based on available preclinical and clinical research. Neither compound is FDA-approved for general therapeutic use. Not medical advice. Not for human use. Created by Lone Star Peptide Co.
Mechanism

CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin work on different receptors but converge on the same outcome: increased GH pulse from the pituitary. This complementary mechanism is why they are so commonly stacked.

DimensionCJC-1295Ipamorelin
Receptor target
GHRH receptor (GHRHR) — the same receptor that endogenous GHRH binds. Acts upstream on the pituitary to prime GH release.
Ghrelin receptor (GHSR-1a) — different mechanism. Mimics ghrelin's GH-releasing action without ghrelin's other effects.
Primary action
Amplifies the baseline GH pulse by increasing pituitary sensitivity to GHRH. Does not trigger a pulse on its own — enhances the natural cycle.
Triggers a GH pulse. Acts independently of GHRH signal. Can stimulate release even without a concurrent GHRH signal.
Half-life
~30 minutes (no-DAC form). Modified at positions 2, 8, 15, 27 vs native GHRH to improve stability vs. native GHRH 1–29 (~7 min).
~2 hours. Longer than GHRPs like GHRP-2 and GHRP-6. Better plasma stability than earlier secretagogues.
Selectivity
Selective for GHRH receptors. Does not meaningfully stimulate cortisol or prolactin at research doses in animal models.
Highly selective. Does not significantly stimulate cortisol, prolactin, or ACTH at research doses. This selectivity is the defining feature vs. older GHRPs.
Why stack together?
Primes the pituitary via GHRH pathway. The synergy with a GHRP like Ipamorelin produces a larger GH pulse than either alone.
Triggers the pulse via ghrelin pathway. When combined with CJC-1295, amplifies total GH output by acting on a second receptor simultaneously.
Evidence Quality
DimensionCJC-1295Ipamorelin
Evidence baseLimited preclinical + early human
Fewer published studies than Ipamorelin's clinical data. Modified GRF compounds have a smaller literature than native GHRH analogs. Some human pharmacokinetic data published (Ionescu 2006).
Phase 2 human data exists
Ipamorelin reached Phase 2 clinical trials (Helsinn/Novo Nordisk for postoperative GI dysfunction). Human pharmacokinetic and GH stimulation data are available. Most human-studied GHRP in this category.
Human clinical trialsLimited
Small human pharmacokinetic studies exist (e.g., Ionescu et al., 2006 — dose-dependent GH increases in healthy adults). No large-scale efficacy RCTs published.
Phase 2 completed
Completed Phase 2 for postoperative ileus (Helsinn). Phase 2 for obesity-related GH deficiency. Did not advance to Phase 3 for those indications. Human safety and PK data are available.
Divergence from researchHigh
Community dosing (100–300 mcg daily, SQ) is not derived from published human clinical data. Extrapolated from animal studies and anecdotal reports. No human dose-response curve published for these protocols.
Moderate
Phase 2 doses (200–300 mcg) overlap with community protocols, though the indication (postoperative ileus) is different from community use cases (GH optimization, body composition). Closer alignment than CJC-1295.
IGF-1 effects
Human data shows sustained IGF-1 elevation with repeated dosing. The Ionescu study showed dose-dependent IGF-1 increases 7 days post-injection. Longer half-life contributes to this.
GH pulse stimulation confirmed in humans. IGF-1 response less characterized in community-relevant dosing protocols. Shorter half-life means more transient effect per administration.
Practical Comparison
DimensionCJC-1295Ipamorelin
Common ref. amount
100–300 mcg per administration. Community: typically before sleep to align with natural GH pulse.
200–300 mcg per administration. Same timing pattern: before sleep or fasted state.
Community frequency
Daily (when used with Ipamorelin in stack). Some 5 days on / 2 days off protocols discussed in forums. No research basis for cycling.
Daily in stack protocols. Sometimes 1–3× daily in community use, though human PK data from trials suggests once daily dosing.
Typical stack
Almost always stacked with Ipamorelin or another GHRP. Rarely used alone in community protocols due to its amplifying (rather than triggering) mechanism.
Frequently paired with CJC-1295. Can be used alone. Most-cited "clean" GHRP due to selectivity for GH without cortisol/prolactin effects.
Regulatory status 2026
Not part of the July 2026 PCAC review. Named in the 2026 HHS reconsideration; no vote yet. Currently sold RUO.
Also not part of the July 2026 review. Status pending a future PCAC round. Currently sold RUO.
Research Verdict
Complementary, not interchangeable. Ipamorelin has a better evidence base.
CJC-1295 and Ipamorelin work through different receptors to produce the same downstream effect — amplified GH release — which is why stacking them makes mechanistic sense. But they are not equivalent. Ipamorelin has the stronger human evidence base: it reached Phase 2 clinical trials, which means pharmacokinetic and safety data in humans actually exists. CJC-1295 has limited human data beyond early PK studies. Neither is approved for any therapeutic use.
CJC-1295 profile
  • Amplifies GH pulse via GHRH receptor
  • Best used in combination (not solo)
  • Limited human clinical data
  • High divergence — community protocols extrapolated
Ipamorelin profile
  • Triggers GH pulse via ghrelin receptor
  • Selective — no meaningful cortisol/prolactin effect
  • Phase 2 human data exists (GI indication)
  • Moderate divergence — closer to studied doses
Editorial summary of preclinical and clinical research. Not medical advice. Not instruction for human use. Neither compound was part of the July 2026 PCAC review; both remain sold RUO.
The Stack Context
CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin is among the most commonly discussed GH secretagogue stacks in research and biohacking communities. The mechanistic rationale is sound: two different receptor pathways converging on GH release produce synergistic pulse amplification. No human studies have evaluated this specific combination. All stack data is derived from community reports and mechanistic inference. Not a recommendation.
Related Comparisons
Where to Source
Source CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin

Lone Star Peptide Co. carries the CJC-1295 + Ipamorelin research blend — batch-specific COAs, third-party testing, and same-day domestic shipping from Houston, TX.

Peptide Atlas is created by Lone Star Peptide Co. — a disclosed placement. Full disclosure.
Visit Lone Star Peptide Co. →
Free Research Digest
The Peptide Research Digest
Regulatory updates, new compound coverage, and vendor transparency changes. No sales pitch.
No spam · Unsubscribe any time